You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Contraceptive Efficacy of the Diaphragm, the Sponge and the Cervical Cap
James Trussell, Jennifer Strickler and Barbara Vaughan
Family Planning Perspectives
Vol. 25, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1993), pp. 100-105+135
Published by: Guttmacher Institute
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2136156
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Vaginal diaphragms, Contraceptive sponges, Cervical caps, Birth control, Prostate cancer, Vasectomy, Children, Disease risk, Estimation methods, Pregnancy
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A reanalysis of data from two clinical studies--in which 1,439 women were randomly assigned to use either the contraceptive sponge or the diaphragm and 1,394 women were randomly assigned to use either the cervical cap or the diaphragm--found first-year probabilities of failure during typical use of 17% for the sponge, 18% for the cervical cap and 13-17% for the diaphragm. The first-year probabilities of failure during perfect use are 11-12% for the sponge, 10-13% for the cervical cap and 4-8% for the diaphragm. The probability of failure during perfect use is significantly higher among women who have given birth than among those who have not for users of the sponge (19-21% vs. 9-10%) and users of the cervical cap (26-27% vs. 8-10%), but not for users of the diaphragm.
Family Planning Perspectives © 1993 Guttmacher Institute