Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Brazil's Fertility Decline, 1965-95: A Fresh Look at Key Factors

George Martine
Population and Development Review
Vol. 22, No. 1 (Mar., 1996), pp. 47-75
Published by: Population Council
DOI: 10.2307/2137686
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2137686
Page Count: 29
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($16.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available

Abstract

Brazil's rapid fertility decline occurred during a period of extraordinarily intense social change, which encompassed times of both rapid economic growth and economic crisis. The widespread institutional changes introduced by the military regime in the mid-1960s as part of its efforts to induce rapid modernization had several unintended impacts on the motivation to control fertility and on the ability to do so. Several characteristics of Brazil's fertility decline warrant highlighting. First, high rates of abortion and sterilization are the primary means by which the decline was achieved. This outcome is partly attributable to the interplay of attitudes, policies, and changing agendas of key social actors, which tended to limit the practical availability of other effective methods. The increased motivation to control fertility is traceable to the indirect effects of institutional changes in the areas of health and social security. The strong influence of the mass media on social behavior, including reproductive behavior, is also noteworthy.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
47
    47
  • Thumbnail: Page 
48
    48
  • Thumbnail: Page 
49
    49
  • Thumbnail: Page 
50
    50
  • Thumbnail: Page 
51
    51
  • Thumbnail: Page 
52
    52
  • Thumbnail: Page 
53
    53
  • Thumbnail: Page 
54
    54
  • Thumbnail: Page 
55
    55
  • Thumbnail: Page 
56
    56
  • Thumbnail: Page 
57
    57
  • Thumbnail: Page 
58
    58
  • Thumbnail: Page 
59
    59
  • Thumbnail: Page 
60
    60
  • Thumbnail: Page 
61
    61
  • Thumbnail: Page 
62
    62
  • Thumbnail: Page 
63
    63
  • Thumbnail: Page 
64
    64
  • Thumbnail: Page 
65
    65
  • Thumbnail: Page 
66
    66
  • Thumbnail: Page 
67
    67
  • Thumbnail: Page 
68
    68
  • Thumbnail: Page 
69
    69
  • Thumbnail: Page 
70
    70
  • Thumbnail: Page 
71
    71
  • Thumbnail: Page 
72
    72
  • Thumbnail: Page 
73
    73
  • Thumbnail: Page 
74
    74
  • Thumbnail: Page 
75
    75