You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Reliability of Simulated Clients' Quality-of-Care Ratings
Federico R. Leon, Gustavo Quiroz and Alfredo Brazzoduro
Studies in Family Planning
Vol. 25, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1994), pp. 184-190
Published by: Population Council
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2137944
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Simulations, Family planning, Rating scales, Health care quality, Simulation training, Quality analysis, Observational research, Prices, Family planning services, Psychological assessment
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Evaluators of family planning programs have begun to use simulated client ratings to assess the quality of services. However, little is known about the reliability of such ratings when they are used to assess individual provider performance. This study examined the reliability of quality-of-care ratings in a Peruvian community-based distribution program by using pairs of concealed observers--a simulated client and a companion. Average interrater agreement, measured by intraclass correlation, was .50, indicating that ratings are not reliable enough for the evaluation of a single provider by a single rater. The study results suggest that checklist-item scores referring to specific provider behaviors will be more reliable and useful than ratings.
Studies in Family Planning © 1994 Population Council