You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Reliability of the Situation Analysis Observation Guide
Dale Huntington, Kate Miller and Barbara Mensch
Studies in Family Planning
Vol. 27, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1996), pp. 277-282
Published by: Population Council
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2137999
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Observational research, Simulations, Family planning, Family planning services, Data collection, Physicians, Health care quality, Nurses, Turkeys, Research studies
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The use of direct observation to assess the quality of family planning services is a central element of situation analysis studies. The interrater reliability of observational data from a study in Turkey was assessed using teams of multiple observers. Overall, the findings suggest a strong degree of reliability. Observers were more likely to agree when rating physical actions than verbal cues and when both observers were of similar backgrounds. The high degree of reliability in the situation analysis observation guide is considered to be due to a relatively low level of measurement and the use of crude indicators for several dimensions of quality. The guide's reliability makes this sort of study particularly valuable to family planning clinicians, program managers, and policymakers.
Studies in Family Planning © 1996 Population Council