You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Michael Greenberg, Dona Schneider and Daiwoo Choi
Vol. 84, No. 1 (Jan., 1994), pp. 1-15
Published by: American Geographical Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/215777
Page Count: 15
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The hypothesis tested in this study is that neighborhoods with multiple technological and behavioral hazards have lower-quality ratings than do neighborhoods with a single massive technological hazard. More than 280 households were surveyed in a heavily industrialized eight-square-kilometer area southwest of Philadelphia. Respondents who gave a low rating to the area listed multiple hazards, especially crime, as distressing characteristics. Respondents who characterized the area as excellent or good rated their previous neighborhood as poor. Geographical theory should explain how different populations perceive behavioral, technological, and natural hazards at the neighborhood scale.
Geographical Review © 1994 American Geographical Society