Access
You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen Reader
This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.Contributions to the Theory of Sequential Analysis. I
M. A. Girshick
The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
Vol. 17, No. 2 (Jun., 1946), pp. 123143
Published by: Institute of Mathematical Statistics
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2236034
Page Count: 21
 Item Type
 Article
 Thumbnails
 References
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Abstract
Given two populations π1 and π2 each characterized by a distribution density f(x, θ) which is assumed to be known, except for the value of the parameter θ. It is desired to test the composite hypothesis $\theta_1 < \theta_2$ against the alternative hypothesis $\theta_1 > \theta_2$ where θi is the value of the parameter in the distribution density of πi, (i = 1, 2). The criterion proposed for testing this hypothesis is based on the sequential probability ratio and consists of the following: Choose two positive constants a and b and two values of θ, say θ0 1 and θ0 2. Take pairs of observations x1α from π1 and x2α from π2, (α = 1,2, ...), in sequence and compute Zj = ∑j α = 1 zα where $z_\alpha = \log \big\lbrack \frac{f(x_{2\alpha}, \theta^0_1)f(x_{1\alpha}, \theta^0_2)} {f(x_{2\alpha}, \theta^0_2)f(x_{1\alpha}, \theta^0_1)}\big\rbrack.$ The hypothesis tested is accepted or rejected depending on whether Zn ≥ a or Zn ≤  b where n is the smallest integer j for which either one of these relationships is satisfied. The boundaries a and b are partly given in terms of the desired risks of making an erroneous decision. The values θ0 1 and θ0 2 define the magnitude of the difference between the values of θ in π1 and in π2 which is considered worth detecting. It is shown that the power of this test is constant on a curve h(θ1, θ2) = constant. If E(log f(x, θ0 2)/f(x, θ0 1)) is a monotonic function of θ, then the test is unbiased in the sense that all points (θ1, θ2) which lie on the curve h(θ1, θ2) = constant are such that either every $\theta_1 < \theta_2$ or every $\theta_1 > \theta_2$. For a large class of known distributions the quantity h is shown to be an appropriate measure of the difference between θ1 and θ2 and the test procedure for this class of distributions is simple and intuitively sensible. For the case of the binomial, the exact power of this test as well as the distribution of n is given.
Page Thumbnails

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143
The Annals of Mathematical Statistics © 1946 Institute of Mathematical Statistics