Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Commentary on Andersen and Gill's "Cox's Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study"

Steven G. Self and Ross L. Prentice
The Annals of Statistics
Vol. 10, No. 4 (Dec., 1982), pp. 1121-1124
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2240715
Page Count: 4
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($19.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Commentary on Andersen and Gill's "Cox's Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study"
Preview not available

Abstract

In this issue Andersen and Gill (hereafter AG) present a stimulating development of asymptotic distribution theory for the Cox regression model with time-dependent covariates. They use a counting process formulation for the failure time data and martingale covergence results. This approach involves such conditions as σ-algebra right continuity and predictable, locally bounded, covariate processes. In this commentary we consider the implications of such assumptions for likelihood factorization and covariate modeling. In particular, it is noted that the partial likelihood function modeled by AG cannot, in general, involve covariate measurements at the random failure times. Some related work by the authors on a partial likelihood function that may involve covariate values at the random failure times is briefly discussed. Assumptions under which the intensity process modeled by AG has a standard "hazard" function interpretation are described and some generalizations of the AG results are mentioned.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1121
    1121
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1122
    1122
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1123
    1123
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1124
    1124