Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

A Comparison of GCV and GML for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in the Generalized Spline Smoothing Problem

Grace Wahba
The Annals of Statistics
Vol. 13, No. 4 (Dec., 1985), pp. 1378-1402
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2241360
Page Count: 25
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($19.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
A Comparison of GCV and GML for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in the Generalized Spline Smoothing Problem
Preview not available

Abstract

The partially improper prior behind the smoothing spline model is used to obtain a generalization of the maximum likelihood (GML) estimate for the smoothing parameter. Then this estimate is compared with the generalized cross validation (GCV) estimate both analytically and by Monte Carlo methods. The comparison is based on a predictive mean square error criteria. It is shown that if the true, unknown function being estimated is smooth in a sense to be defined then the GML estimate undersmooths relative to the GCV estimate and the predictive mean square error using the GML estimate goes to zero at a slower rate than the mean square error using the GCV estimate. If the true function is "rough" then the GCV and GML estimates have asymptotically similar behavior. A Monte Carlo experiment was designed to see if the asymptotic results in the smooth case were evident in small sample sizes. Mixed results were obtained for n = 32, GCV was somewhat better than GML for n = 64, and GCV was decidedly superior for n = 128. In the n = 32 case GCV was better for smaller σ2 and the comparison close for larger σ2. The theoretical results are shown to extend to the generalized spline smoothing model, which includes the estimate of functions given noisy values of various integrals of them.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1378
    1378
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1379
    1379
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1380
    1380
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1381
    1381
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1382
    1382
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1383
    1383
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1384
    1384
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1385
    1385
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1386
    1386
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1387
    1387
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1388
    1388
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1389
    1389
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1390
    1390
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1391
    1391
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1392
    1392
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1393
    1393
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1394
    1394
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1395
    1395
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1396
    1396
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1397
    1397
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1398
    1398
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1399
    1399
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1400
    1400
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1401
    1401
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1402
    1402