You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Universal Features of Zonation Between Tide-Marks on Rocky Coasts
T. A. Stephenson and Anne Stephenson
Journal of Ecology
Vol. 37, No. 2 (Dec., 1949), pp. 289-305
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2256610
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Coasts, Fringe, Terminology, Marine ecology, Ecological zones, Species, Algae, Animals, Tidal waves, Ocean tides
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
On the basis of 30 years' first-hand experience of rocky coasts in Britain, North America, South Africa, the Indian Ocean and Australia, it is suggested that certain features of zonation between tide-marks are of such widespread occurrence in the world that they may even be universal. The terminology applicable to the widespread zones is discussed, and a scheme is proposed which defines them and attempts to name them appropriately. The zonation of open rock-surfaces exposed to degrees of wave-action intermediate between maximal and minimal is regarded as the standard from which deviations may most conveniently be recognized. From above downwards shores tend to show the following belts: (1) Supralittoral zone. The maritime belt lying near the sea, above tide-marks, but subject to some maritime influence (e.g. to finely divided spray in rough weather). The lower limit of this zone is the same as the upper limit of the one below. Its upper limit is not within the scope of this paper. (2) Supralittoral fringe. From the upper limit of barnacles (in quantity) to the nearest convenient landmark above this (e.g. the upper limit of Littorinae or the lower limit of maritime land-lichens or flowering plants). High water of spring tides invades at least the lower part of this zone. (3) Midlittoral zone. From the upper limit of barnacles (in quantity) down to the upper limit of the zone below. This belt tends to be covered and uncovered every day, at least in part. (4) Infralittoral fringe. From the upper limit of any convenient dominant organism (e.g. Laminaria, Pyura) to extreme low-water level of spring tides, or to the lowest level ever visible between waves. This zone uncovers only at the major tides, and sometimes only in calm weather. (5) Infralittoral zone. From extreme low water of springs to a depth which has yet to be settled--it may be to the edge of the continental shelf or to the lower limit of seaweed vegetation. An account is given of (a) the standard populations of these zones (p. 292); (b) of some of the principal variations in these populations (p. 293); (c) of the existence of additional local zones (p. 296); and (d) of the local absence of ecologically important species (p. 296). The terms littoral, supralittoral and infralittoral are discussed, in relation to others, and `littoral' is defined as the equivalent of `intertidal'. It is maintained that within the framework of the principal zones, subzones and patch-forming communities, which are much more local in occurrence, can suitably be named, as heretofore, from the organisms which dominate them. The relationship between the zones and tide-levels is discussed (p. 302), especially to emphasize that the zones cannot be defined in terms of tidal levels although related to these, but must be defined in terms of the distribution of organisms.
Journal of Ecology © 1949 British Ecological Society