You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Non-Metric Ordination Methods in Ecology
I. C. Prentice
Journal of Ecology
Vol. 65, No. 1 (Mar., 1977), pp. 85-94
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2259064
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Two basic types of ordination, metric and non-metric, are distinguished and discussed. Non-metric ordination or non-metric scaling, unfamiliar in ecology, is considered to be more powerful in various respects than metric ordination (which includes principal components analysis). Its advantages are discussed with reference to the assumptions which have to be made if ecological inferences are to be drawn. The properties of two-dimensional metric and non-metric ordination are compared in two examples. The first illustrates a long plant succession, and contrasts the linear reconstruction by an appropriate non-metric method with the familiar arch produced by a principal components method. The second shows how two independent gradients--soil base status and grazing intensity in grassland and tall-herb communities--can be satisfactorily reconstructed by a non-metric method.
Journal of Ecology © 1977 British Ecological Society