You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Adaptive Significance of Stomatal Occurrence on One or Both Surfaces of Leaves
David F. Parkhurst
Journal of Ecology
Vol. 66, No. 2 (Jul., 1978), pp. 367-383
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2259142
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Leaves, Mesophyll, Species, Stomata, Plants, Habitats, Water vapor, Transpiration, Xeric environments, Photosynthesis
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) The relationship of stomatal occurrence (on one or both sides of leaves to environment was studied by literature search, mathematical modelling and investigation of herbarium specimens. The starting hypothesis, that hypostomatous leaves (with stomata only on the underside) should occur in dry habitats, was contradicted by all three sources. (2) The models, based on mass-transfer physics, produced three major results: (a) mesophyll thickness is the chief variable determining stomatal distribution, with thick leaves tending to be amphistomatous (with pores on both sides); (b) stomatal distribution does not depend much on environmental variables, but the dependence is strongest under conditions of low water stress; (c) within the limits of the models, amphistomatous leaves appeared nearly always to be better adapted than hypostomatous leaves, indicating that the models are not yet complete. (3) Leaf thickness and stomatal distribution were determined from herbarium specimens of the Indiana species of Compositae, Liliaceae, Salicaceae and Scrophulariaceae. These measurements were then compared with a simple habitat rating derived for each species from published habitat descriptions. Hypostomatous leaves occurred least often in xeric habitats, most often in mesic ones, and again less often in hydric habitats. However, the data suggest that this relationship is secondary, with leaf thickness being the intervening variable. (4) Finally, explanations are considered for the predominance of hypostomatous leaves over hyperstomatous ones.
Journal of Ecology © 1978 British Ecological Society