You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Influence of Diaspore Morphology and Soil-Surface Properties on the Distribution of Grasses
M. H. Peart and H. T. Clifford
Journal of Ecology
Vol. 75, No. 2 (Jun., 1987), pp. 569-576
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2260435
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Forest soils, Species, Grassland soils, Agricultural soils, Sandy loam soils, Clay loam soils, Awns, Soil ecology, Grasses, Plants
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) The abundance of grass species at six sites on each of six different soil groups in grasslands and forests in south-eastern Queensland was determined, and a diaspore-abundance spectrum was produced for each site by classifying the species into three groups with respect to the morphology of their diaspores. (2) In spite of the considerable taxonomic diversity amongst the grass floras of the thirty-six sites, when the dissimilarity between the diaspore-abundance spectra was assessed, clustering revealed two distinct groups of sites. (3) In one group the predominant species possess hygroscopically-active awns; these sites are found exclusively on krasnozems, chocolate soils and black earths. These soils are well structured with a relatively high clay content, and their surfaces are either loose and crumby or crack on drying. While such surface conditions might be expected to provide microsites for all three types of diaspores it is suggested that actively-awned species predominate since their diaspores are at a competitive advantage in locating microsites. (4) In the other group the predominant species bear unawned diaspores; these sites are found exclusively on siliceous sands, red podzolic soils and solodic soils. These soils are apedal with a high sand content. Their surfaces were either hard setting, showed a tendency to form surface crusts or were loose and single grained. Such surfaces do not provide microsites suitable for location by diaspores bearing active awns and it is suggested that the preponderance of unawned species over passively-awned species results from the effects of fire.
Journal of Ecology © 1987 British Ecological Society