You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Seed Banks, Fire Season, Safe Sites and Seedling Recruitment in Five Co-Occurring Banksia Species
N. J. Enright and B. B. Lamont
Journal of Ecology
Vol. 77, No. 4 (Dec., 1989), pp. 1111-1122
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2260826
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Seedlings, Species, Seeds, Autumn, Seed banks, Viability, Poultry litter, Summer, Plants, Follicles
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) The quantity of seed stored in the canopy of five co-occurring Banksia species varied by nearly two orders of magnitude. The three species which resprout vegetatively after fire, produced less seeds and retained smaller seed banks than the two non-sprouting species. (2) Contiguous patches of scrub-heath were burned in spring and autumn. The spring fire was cooler than the autumn fire and both sets of seed released subsequently did not germinate until the following (common) winter. The rate of seed release was higher after the autumn fire than the spring fire. (3) The non-sprouting species released more seeds after each fire and yielded more seedlings per parent than the resprouting species. Percentage (field) germination of the non-sprouters was not consistently different from that of the resprouters. (4) Seeds exposed on the soil surface during summer soon lost viability compared with buried seeds. The large number of seedlings established up to eight months after the spring fire resulted from many seeds escaping exposure by dispersal into litter-covered `safe' sites. (5) Although litter microsites covered only 30% of the ground surface after the spring burn, they accounted for 80% of the seedlings both before and after the summer drought. Litter microsites covered only 14% of the autumn-burned site but accounted for 60% of the seedlings before summer and 40% after summer, suggesting density-dependent thinning of seedlings. (6) The autumn-burned site supported more than twice the density of seedlings than the spring-burned site by the end of the first winter. Summer mortality of seedlings was 32% in the spring-burned site and 65% in the autumn-burned site, equalizing the seedling: parent ratio at both sites. Net recruitment of one-year-old seedlings varied from 0 for two resprouters to over 100 per parent for a non-sprouter.
Journal of Ecology © 1989 British Ecological Society