You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Post-Fire Changes in Community Structure of Tall Tussock Grasslands: A Test of Alternative Models of Succession
Habiba Gitay and J. Bastow Wilson
Journal of Ecology
Vol. 83, No. 5 (Oct., 1995), pp. 775-782
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2261414
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1 Two recently published models of succession are the gradient-in-time model and the competitive-sorting model. The latter predicts that community structure will change during the course of succession, with chance establishment predominating early in succession, and competitive sorting into microhabitats increasing with time. The average strength of positive and negative interspecific associations should therefore increase. There is little evidence available to test these models in real communities. 2 We test the two models using postfire succession in tall tussock grasslands of New Zealand. Twenty-one sites dominated by the tussock grass Chionochloa rigida, and last burnt within the past 30 years, were sampled using contiguous quadrats. Three association coefficients were calculated for each site and related to time since the last fire, presence or absence of grazing, maximum height of vegetation and soil nutrient status. The results were examined at a range of spatial scales. 3 Community structure, as evidenced by the strength of interspecific association at small quadrat sizes, was significantly related to site factors. Mean association was negative in recently burnt sites, and again in sites burnt more than 20 years previously. The trends support the competitive-sorting model over the gradient-in-time model. The results are also compatible with the `three-phase' model of secondary succession suggested by Greig-Smith; we refer to the three phases as `pioneer', `building' and `mature'. 4 There was a significant tendency over all sites for there to be a constant proportion of species from the graminoid vs. forb + bryophyte + lichen$ guilds in a quadrat, compared to null-model expectation. This tendency towards guild proportionality was more marked in lower elevation sites, and in sites where there was no grazing. This supports the existence of determinate community structure, a factor explicitly included in the competitive-sorting model. 5 We conclude that there is significant community structure in the tussock grasslands. The changes in species association are affected by grazing and site quality. The strength of species association can be an index of changes in community structure during succession, in spite of the confounding effect of microsite variation; however, this relationship is affected by grazing and site quality. The competitive-sorting model fits the results more closely than the gradient-in-time model, but the `three-phase' model gives the best fit.
Journal of Ecology © 1995 British Ecological Society