You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Genotypic and Plastic Variation in Plant Size: Effects on Fecundity and Allocation Patterns in Lychnis Flos-Cuculi Along a Gradient of Natural Soil Fertility
Journal of Ecology
Vol. 83, No. 4 (Aug., 1995), pp. 629-642
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2261631
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Plants, Fecundity, Fruit production, Biomass production, Biomass, Natural resources, Predation, Growing seasons, Fruits, Flowers
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1 Genotypic and plastic variation in plant size, and trade-offs among components of reproduction were studied using cloned individuals from 24 parental plants of the perennial hay-meadow species Lychnis flos-cuculi, planted in four sites along a gradient of natural soil fertility. 2 Plant biomass, survival and fecundity differed significantly among clones and sites. Differences in survival and early components of fecundity among clones were strongly determined by clonal differences in average rosette biomass attained during the first year. 3 There were significant clone-site interactions. However, a small number of clones which ranked high for plant biomass and fruit production at all sites, made a large contribution to local fruit production within a year across the entire gradient. 4 Patterns of biomass allocation and timing of first reproduction differed significantly among clones. A large part of this variation could be explained by clonal differences in average plant biomass attained during the first year. We conclude therefore that clonal variation in allocation patterns reflected differences in resource acquisition, rather than differences in partitioning strategies underlying life-history evolution. 5 Consequences of delaying first reproduction varied among sites. Precocity was favoured in the least productive site, whereas at intermediate soil fertility individuals that postponed reproduction gained a three-fold increase in fecundity at first reproduction, with no significant reduction in survival to this stage. Optimal timing of reproduction may thus vary at a small scale. 6 Genetically based trade-offs between vegetative and generative reproduction were only observed in the less productive sites. Costs of reproduction were also only apparent at such sites, supporting the idea that the expression of trade-offs and costs is most likely under low resource conditions. 7 In the more productive sites, within- and among-clone correlations between vegetative and generative reproduction, and among five components of fecundity were generally insignificant or positive. This suggests that when resources are readily available, differences in both microsite quality and resource acquisition among clones governed patterns of covariance. 8 Fruit predation by caterpillars of the noctuid Hadena bicruris was dependent on plant size. In the site with lowest average fecundity, predation tended to increase with individual fecundity, conferring a relative advantage to smaller sized individuals.
Journal of Ecology © 1995 British Ecological Society