If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Extremes in Ecology: Avoiding the Misleading Effects of Sampling Variation in Summary Analyses

William A. Link and John R. Sauer
Ecology
Vol. 77, No. 5 (Jul., 1996), pp. 1633-1640
DOI: 10.2307/2265557
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265557
Page Count: 8
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Extremes in Ecology: Avoiding the Misleading Effects of Sampling Variation in Summary Analyses
Preview not available

Abstract

Surveys such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) produce large collections of parameter estimates. One's natural inclination when confronted with lists of parameter estimates is to look for the extreme values: in the BBS, these correspond to the species that appear to have the greatest changes in population size through time. Unfortunately, extreme estimates are liable to correspond to the most poorly estimated parameters. Consequently, the most extreme parameters may not match up with the most extreme parameter estimates. The ranking of parameter values on the basis of their estimates is a difficult statistical problem. We use data on 401 species from the BBS and simulations to illustrate the potential misleading effects of sampling variation in rankings of parameters. We describe empirical Bayes and constrained empirical Bayes procedures that provide partial solutions to the problem of ranking in the presence of sampling variation.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1633
    1633
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1634
    1634
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1635
    1635
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1636
    1636
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1637
    1637
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1638
    1638
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1639
    1639
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1640
    1640