Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Can a Well-Fitted Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Model Produce Mean Reversion?

M. Bonomo and R. Garcia
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Vol. 9, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1994), pp. 19-29
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2285234
Page Count: 11
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Can a Well-Fitted Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Model Produce Mean Reversion?
Preview not available

Abstract

In recent papers, Cecchetti et al. (1990) and Kandel and Stambaugh (1990) showed that negative serial correlation in long horizon returns was consistent with an equilibrium model of asset pricing. In this paper, we show that their results rely on misspecified Markov switching models for the endowment process. Once the proper Markov specification is chosen for the endowment process, the model does not produce mean reversion of the magnitude detected in the data. Furthermore, the small amount of mean reversion produced by the model is due only to small sample bias. We also show that this model is unable to predict negative excess returns, contrary to empirical evidence.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[19]
    [19]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
20
    20
  • Thumbnail: Page 
21
    21
  • Thumbnail: Page 
22
    22
  • Thumbnail: Page 
23
    23
  • Thumbnail: Page 
24
    24
  • Thumbnail: Page 
25
    25
  • Thumbnail: Page 
26
    26
  • Thumbnail: Page 
27
    27
  • Thumbnail: Page 
28
    28
  • Thumbnail: Page 
29
    29