You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Bayesian Model Averaging for Linear Regression Models
Adrian E. Raftery, David Madigan and Jennifer A. Hoeting
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Vol. 92, No. 437 (Mar., 1997), pp. 179-191
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2291462
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Modeling, Predictive modeling, Statistical models, Linear regression, Probabilities, Regression analysis, Markov chains, Calibration, Former slaves, Prisons
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
We consider the problem of accounting for model uncertainty in linear regression models. Conditioning on a single selected model ignores model uncertainty, and thus leads to the underestimation of uncertainty when making inferences about quantities of interest. A Bayesian solution to this problem involves averaging over all possible models (i.e., combinations of predictors) when making inferences about quantities of interest. This approach is often not practical. In this article we offer two alternative approaches. First, we describe an ad hoc procedure, "Occam's window," which indicates a small set of models over which a model average can be computed. Second, we describe a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach that directly approximates the exact solution. In the presence of model uncertainty, both of these model averaging procedures provide better predictive performance than any single model that might reasonably have been selected. In the extreme case where there are many candidate predictors but no relationship between any of them and the response, standard variable selection procedures often choose some subset of variables that yields a high R2 and a highly significant overall F value. In this situation, Occam's window usually indicates the null model (or a small number of models including the null model) as the only one (or ones) to be considered thus largely resolving the problem of selecting significant models when there is no signal in the data. Software to implement our methods is available from StatLib.
Journal of the American Statistical Association © 1997 American Statistical Association