You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The abuse of regression in the National Health Service allocation formulae: response to the Department of Health's 2007 `resource allocation research paper'
Jane Galbraith and Mervyn Stone
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society)
Vol. 174, No. 3 (JULY 2011), pp. 517-528
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23013508
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Statistical models, Determinants of supply, Budget allocation, Health care industry, Funding, Modeling, Variable coefficients, Capitation payments, Regression analysis, Linear regression
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Weighted capitation formulae for the allocation of funds to England's regional health authorities go back decades. In 2006, a paper in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, criticized the formula that has been used, with little change, from 2003 to 2009. The Department of Health has responded tangentially in a report from a team of academics whose remit was to revise the formula for its continued use beyond 2009. The Series A critique is here renewed and strengthened by analysis of the role of some elementary statistical tools in the construction of the latest formula. The conclusion is that, if the force of the extended critique is accepted, other approaches will have to be considered.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) © 2011 Royal Statistical Society