You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Anticipating Entry: Major Party Positioning and Third Party Threat
Daniel J. Lee
Political Research Quarterly
Vol. 65, No. 1 (MARCH 2012), pp. 138-150
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23209565
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Political candidates, Third parties, Voting, Political parties, Ballots, Third party candidates, Political science, Signatures, Modeling, Political elections
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Observers of U.S. elections have reason to believe that third parties are not relevant political actors since they rarely win many votes or influence which major party wins an election. Researchers should use dependent variables besides vote choice and vote share to find third party effects that are a normal aspect of the American two-party system. A spatial model of elections motivates the hypothesis that a higher likelihood of third party entry induces greater major party candidate divergence. An empirical test that uses candidate positioning data in the 1996 U.S. House elections provides evidence of this third party effect.
Political Research Quarterly © 2012 University of Utah