Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability

Marc W. Cadotte, Russell Dinnage and David Tilman
Ecology
Vol. 93, No. 8, Supplement: Integrating ecology and phylogenetics (August 2012), pp. S223-S233
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23229920
Page Count: 11
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability
Preview not available

Abstract

Ecosystem stability in variable environments depends on the diversity of form and function of the constituent species. Species phenotypes and ecologies are the product of evolution, and the evolutionary history represented by co-occurring species has been shown to be an important predictor of ecosystem function. If phylogenetic distance is a surrogate for ecological differences, then greater evolutionary diversity should buffer ecosystems against environmental variation and result in greater ecosystem stability. We calculated both abundance-weighted and unweighted phylogenetic measures of plant community diversity for a long-term biodiversity—ecosystem function experiment at Cedar Creek, Minnesota, USA. We calculated a detrended measure of stability in aboveground biomass production in experimental plots and showed that phylogenetic relatedness explained variation in stability. Our results indicate that communities where species are evenly and distantly related to one another are more stable compared to communities where phylogenetic relationships are more clumped. This result could be explained by a phylogenetic sampling effect, where some lineages show greater stability in productivity compared to other lineages, and greater evolutionary distances reduce the chance of sampling only unstable groups. However, we failed to find evidence for similar stabilities among closely related species. Alternatively, we found evidence that plot biomass variance declined with increasing phylogenetic distances, and greater evolutionary distances may represent species that are ecologically different (phylogenetic complementarity). Accounting for evolutionary relationships can reveal how diversity in form and function may affect stability.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
S223
    S223
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S224
    S224
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S225
    S225
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S226
    S226
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S227
    S227
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S228
    S228
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S229
    S229
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S230
    S230
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S231
    S231
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S232
    S232
  • Thumbnail: Page 
S233
    S233