You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Life Interventions for Family Effectiveness (LIFE) Project: Preliminary Findings on Alternative School Intervention for Adolescents
Donnie W. Watson, Michele Mouttapa, Chris Reiber, William Jason McCuller, Ruben Arancibi, Julia A. Kavich, Elena Nieves, Judith Novgrod, Noemi Mai, Lorrie Bisesi and Tiffanie Sim
Journal of Correctional Education (1974-)
Vol. 58, No. 1 (March 2007), pp. 57-68
Published by: Correctional Education Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23282615
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A non-randomized control trial was conducted to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the Life Interventions for Family Effectiveness (LIFE) project: a family-based, evidence-based comprehensive substance abuse intervention for at-risk adolescents and their families. The Matrix Adolescent Treatment Model of program delivery was utilized in the LIFE intervention; it is a comprehensive therapeutic approach that includes activities at school, at community locations, and at the students' homes. School activities included computer literacy programs, computer assisted graphic arts, and musical expressive arts. Participants were 58 Latino and African American adolescents attending two alternative Southern California schools as a result of numerous delinquent behaviors. Twenty-eight participants in one school received the LIFE intervention and 30 participants in the other school received the usual social services. Comparisons between and within the two intervention groups on outcome variables were made at the end of the 3-month intervention.
Journal of Correctional Education (1974-) © 2007 Correctional Education Association