You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The CAPM is Wanted, Dead or Alive
Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French
The Journal of Finance
Vol. 51, No. 5 (Dec., 1996), pp. 1947-1958
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2329545
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Financial portfolios, Finance, Capital asset pricing models, Stock exchanges, Expected returns, Stock prices, Financial economics, Common stock, Economic theory, Growth stocks
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Kothari, Shanken, and Sloan (1995) claim that βs from annual returns produce a stronger positive relation between β and average return than βs from monthly returns. They also contend that the relation between average return and book-to-market equity (BE/ME) is seriously exaggerated by survivor bias. We argue that survivor bias does not explain the relation between BE/ME and average return. We also show that annual and monthly βs produce the same inferences about the β premium. Our main point on the β premium is, however, more basic. It cannot save the Capital asset pricing model (CAPM), given the evidence that β alone cannot explain expected return.
The Journal of Finance © 1996 American Finance Association