You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Statistical Inference for Poisson and Multinomial Models for Capture- Recapture Experiments
R. L. Sandland and R. M. Cormack
Vol. 71, No. 1 (Apr., 1984), pp. 27-33
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2336393
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Population estimates, Population size, Statistical models, Parametric models, Maximum likelihood estimation, Maximum likelihood estimators, Ratio test, Statistics, Parameterization, Censuses
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The classical multinomial model used for estimating the size of a closed population is compared to the highly flexible Poisson models introduced by Cormack (1981). The multinomial model, and generalizations of it which allow for dependence between samples, may be obtained from that of Cormack by conditioning on the population size. The maximum likelihood estimators for N, the population size, and θ, the vector of parameters describing the capture process, are the same in both models. Completely general formulae for the asymptotic variances of the maximum likelihood estimates of N for both models are given. The substantial differences between the variances under the two models are discussed. Hypotheses concerning θ may be tested using the log likelihood ratio; the procedures which result from both models are asymptotically equivalent under the null hypothesis but differ in power under the alternative.
Biometrika © 1984 Biometrika Trust