You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Two nitrite reductase isoforms are present in tomato cotyledons and are regulated differently by UV-A or UV-B light and during plant development
Andrea Migge, Elisa Carrayol, Bertrand Hirel, Michael Lohmann, Gudrun Meya and Thomas W. Becker
Vol. 207, No. 2 (December 1998), pp. 229-234
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23385476
Page Count: 6
Preview not available
The regulation by UV-A or UV-B light of the nuclear gene(s) encoding the plastidic enzyme nitrite reductase (NiR; EC 126.96.36.199) was examined in the cotyledons of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Two NiR isoforms designated NiR1 and NiR2 with apparent molecular masses of 63 kDa and 62 kDa, respectively, were detected by immunoblot analysis in total soluble protein extracts derived from tomato seedling cotyledons. Genomic Southern blot analysis indicated the presence of two NiR genes per haploid tomato genome. In etiolated tomato cotyledons, the total NiR protein pool was almost exclusively constituted by NiR1. In contrast, NiR2 was the predominant NiR isoform in the cotyledons of tomato seedlings grown in white light. Illumination of etiolated tomato cotyledons with UV-A or UV-B light resulted in an increase in both the total NiR transcript level and the NiR2 protein abundance. Blue light stimulated the NiR2 protein pool above the level obtained with red light of equal photon fluence rate. These results show that NiR2 protein expression is light-inducible and that the light-stimulation of NiR2 protein accumulation involves the action of both phytochrome and a specific blue-light photoreceptor. The NiR1 protein level remained virtually unaffected by the light treatments. The change in the relative proportion of the NiR isoforms during greening of etiolated tomato cotyledons is, therefore, due to the different light-responsiveness of the genes corresponding to NiR1 or NiR2. The physiological significance of the presence of NiR isoforms that are regulated differently by light in tomato cotyledons is discussed.
Planta © 1998 Springer