You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Is Statistics a Science?
M. J. R. Healy
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)
Vol. 141, No. 3 (1978), pp. 385-393
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2344809
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Technology, Statistics, Biomedical technology, Medical practice, Computer technology, Applied statistics, Research methods, Clinical trials, Experimentation, Inductive reasoning
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A distinction is drawn between science and technology. The former has been studied by Karl Popper and his ideas are widely accepted; the latter has had less attention. The inter-relations of the two are considered and it is pointed out that neither can be said to underlie or dominate the other though practitioners of each are often intolerant of the alternative approach. Statistics may have a more important role to play in technology than in science; it may itself best be considered as a technology rather than as a science. These ideas are discussed in the context of the teaching and practice of statistics in general and medical statistics in particular.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) © 1978 Royal Statistical Society