You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Graphical Elicitation of a Prior Distribution for a Clinical Trial
Kathryn Chaloner, Timothy Church, Thomas A. Louis and John P. Matts
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician)
Vol. 42, No. 4, Special Issue: Conference on Practical Bayesian Statistics, 1992 (1993), pp. 341-353
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2348469
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Placebos, Clinical trials, Toxoplasmosis, Modeling, Statistical models, Regression coefficients, AIDS, Physicians, Regression analysis, Approximation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Bayesian methods are potentially useful for the design, monitoring and analysis of clinical trials. These methods, however, require that prior information be quantified and that the methods be robust. This paper describes a method to help quantify beliefs in the form of a prior distribution about regression coefficients in a proportional hazards regression model. The method uses dynamic graphical displays of probability distributions that can be freehand adjusted. The method was developed for, and is applied to, a randomized trial comparing prophylaxes for toxoplasmosis in a population of HIV-positive individuals. Prior distributions from five AIDS experts are elicited. The experts represent a community of consumers of the results of the trial and these prior distributions can be used to try to make the monitoring and analysis of the trial robust.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician) © 1993 Royal Statistical Society