You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Do Perceptions of Ballot Secrecy Influence Turnout? Results from a Field Experiment
Alan S. Gerber, Gregory A. Huber, David Doherty, Conor M. Dowling and Seth J. Hill
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 57, No. 3 (July 2013), pp. 537-551
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23496637
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Ballots, Voter registration, Voting, Voter turnout, Political science, Placebos, Civic duty, Field experiments, Mailings, State elections
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although the secret ballot has been secured as a legal matter in the United States, formal secrecy protections are not equivalent to convincing citizens that they may vote privately and without fear of reprisal. We present survey evidence that those who have not previously voted are particularly likely to voice doubts about the secrecy of the voting process. We then report results from a field experiment where we mailed information about protections of ballot secrecy to registered voters prior to the 2010 general election. Consistent with our survey data, we find that these letters increased turnout for registered citizens without records of previous turnout, but they did not appear to influence the behavior of citizens who had previously voted. The increase in turnout of more than three percentage points (20%) for those without previous records of voting is notably larger than the effect of a standard get-out-the-vote mailing for this group. Overall, these results suggest that although the secret ballot is a long-standing institution in the United States, beliefs about this institution may not match the legal reality.
American Journal of Political Science © 2013 Midwest Political Science Association