Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

האם מלאך המוות ממית את החכמים? לגישתם המיוחדת של הסתמאים / Does the Angel of Death Kill Torah Scholars? The Approach of the Stammaim

בעז שפיגל and Boaz Spiegel
Hebrew Union College Annual
Vol. 79 (2008), pp. מט-פו
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23509736
Page Count: 38
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
האם מלאך המוות ממית את החכמים? לגישתם המיוחדת של הסתמאים / Does the Angel of Death Kill Torah Scholars? The Approach of the Stammaim
Preview not available

Abstract

Our study shows two approaches of talmudic literature to the question of whether the Angel of Death is the one who takes the life of Torah scholars. The earlier, more original approach posits that the scholar was not under the jurisdiction of the Angel of Death. Such an approach can be found in the midreshei halakhah and also found, both explicitly and implicitly, in the Talmud of the Land of Israel and in midreshei ʾaggadah, all composed in the Land of Israel. This early position was preserved as well in the Babylonian Talmud, both in tannaitic and amoraic sources, but only in the sections that have clear attributions. However, in the non-attributed, stammaitic sections, one finds witness to a different approach. According to the stam of the Bavli the Angel of Death is personally responsible for the death of scholars. We try to prove that the new position, as found especially in the stories of the stammaitic sections of the Bavli, is late and post-amoraic. At the end of our research, we offer an explanation for the new stammaitic approach based upon the studies of Jeffrey Rubenstein and Yaakov Elman.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
מט
    מט
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נ
    נ
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נא
    נא
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נב
    נב
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נג
    נג
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נד
    נד
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נה
    נה
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נו
    נו
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נז
    נז
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נח
    נח
  • Thumbnail: Page 
נט
    נט
  • Thumbnail: Page 
ס
    ס
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סא
    סא
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סב
    סב
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סג
    סג
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סד
    סד
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סה
    סה
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סו
    סו
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סז
    סז
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סח
    סח
  • Thumbnail: Page 
סט
    סט
  • Thumbnail: Page 
ע
    ע
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עא
    עא
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עב
    עב
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עג
    עג
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עד
    עד
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עה
    עה
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עו
    עו
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עז
    עז
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עח
    עח
  • Thumbnail: Page 
עט
    עט
  • Thumbnail: Page 
פ
    פ
  • Thumbnail: Page 
פא
    פא
  • Thumbnail: Page 
פב
    פב
  • Thumbnail: Page 
פג
    פג
  • Thumbnail: Page 
פד
    פד
  • Thumbnail: Page 
פה
    פה
  • Thumbnail: Page 
פו
    פו