You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Drift, Admixture, and Selection in Human Evolution: A Study with DNA Polymorphisms
Anne M. Bowcock, Judith R. Kidd, Joanna L. Mountain, Joan M. Herbert, Luciano Carotenuto, Kenneth K. Kidd and Luca Cavalli-Sforza
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 88, No. 3 (Feb. 1, 1991), pp. 839-843
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2356081
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Admixtures, Gene frequency, Evolution, Simulations, Genetics, DNA, Population size, Humans, Population estimates, Natural selection
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Accuracy of evolutionary analysis of populations within a species requires the testing of a large number of genetic polymorphisms belonging to many loci. We report here a reconstruction of human differentiation based on 100 DNA polymorphisms tested in five populations from four continents. The results agree with earlier conclusions based on other classes of genetic markers but reveal that Europeans do not fit a simple model of independently evolving populations with equal evolutionary rates. Evolutionary models involving early admixture are compatible with the data. Taking one such model into account, we examined through simulation whether random genetic drift alone might explain the variation among gene frequencies across populations and genes. A measure of variation among populations was calculated for each polymorphism, and its distribution for the 100 polymorphisms was compared with that expected for a drift-only hypothesis. At least two-thirds of the polymorphisms appear to be selectively neutral, but there are significant deviations at the two ends of the observed distribution of the measure of variation: a slight excess of polymorphisms with low variation and a greater excess with high variation. This indicates that a few DNA polymorphisms are affected by natural selection, rarely heterotic, and more often disruptive, while most are selectively neutral.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 1991 National Academy of Sciences