You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Attack Advertising, the "White" Decision, and Voter Participation in State Supreme Court Elections
Melinda Gann Hall and Chris W. Bonneau
Political Research Quarterly
Vol. 66, No. 1 (MARCH 2013), pp. 115-126
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563593
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Political campaigns, State elections, Ballots, Advertising campaigns, Judicial elections, Political elections, Political advertising, Voting, Electoral districts
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This project evaluates whether televised attack advertising and less restrictive campaign speech codes brought about by Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002) have had adverse effects on citizen participation in state supreme court elections. The authors' specific focus is on partisan and nonpartisan races from 2002 through 2006. Overall, they find that attack ads and liberalized speech codes actually mobilize rather than demobilize the electorate. These findings highlight the striking similarities between supreme court elections and elections to other important offices. These results also raise questions about the validity of normative accounts of the relationship between citizens and the bench.
Political Research Quarterly © 2013 University of Utah