You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Discrimination of DNA Response Elements for Thyroid Hormone and Estrogen is Dependent on Dimerization of Receptor DNA Binding Domains
Margaret A. Hirst, Lindsay Hinck, Mark Danielsen and Gordon M. Ringold
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 89, No. 12 (Jun. 15, 1992), pp. 5527-5531
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2359686
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Receptors, Amino acids, Dimers, Response elements, Dimerization, Zinc, DNA, Monomers, Estrogens, Plasmids
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We and others have previously shown that a two-amino acid substitution in the base of the first zinc finger of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain (DBD) is sufficient to alter the receptor's target DNA from a glucocorticoid response element (GRE) to an estrogen response element (ERE). Activation of a thyroid hormone response element (TRE) has been shown to require an additional five-amino acid change in the second zinc finger of the thyroid hormone receptor (TR). Using closely related TRE and ERE sequences, we report that a receptor containing the TR DBD activates the ERE poorly, and receptors containing essential amino acids of the estrogen receptor (ER) DBD activate the TRE poorly. The ER DBD (expressed in Escherichia coli) selectively bound to a 32P-labeled ERE (32P-ERE) as a dimer and a 32P-TRE as a monomer, whereas the TR DBD bound 32P-TRE as a dimer and 32P-ERE as a monomer. When hybrid receptor DBDs were examined, we found that the five amino acids in the second zinc finger of the TR necessary for TRE activation were also essential for dimer formation on a TRE. Dimer formation of ER on an ERE was localized to the second half of the second zinc finger. These results suggest that the ability of ER and TR to functionally discriminate between an ERE and a TRE is a result of dimerization of their DBDs.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 1992 National Academy of Sciences