You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Notions of Rights over Land and the History of Mongolian Pastoralism
Vol. 3, No. 1 (2001), pp. 41-58
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23615447
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Agricultural land, Pastures, Pastoralism, Public land, Land use, Private land, Land ownership, Farm economics, Livestock, Land economics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In the 1990s the Mongolian state implemented a series of reforms designed to create a competitive market economy based on private property. These included the wholesale privatisation of the pastoral economy and the dissolution of the collective and state farms. The Asian Development Bank and other international development agencies advocated new legislation to allow the private ownership of land. This remains a highly controversial issue in Mongolia, particularly with respect to pasture land which remains a public-access resource. This paper reviews the history of conflicting notions of rights over land, and explores the ways in which indigenous concepts are rooted in pastoral practices and institutions which have long histories on the Mongolian steppe. The history of pastoral institutions in Mongolia reveals the ways in which land formed part of wider sociotechnical systems — activities linking techniques and material objects to the social coordination of labour. These attitudes to land use can be contrasted with the more exclusive and commercial notions of land ownership of Chinese agricultural and urban society. Indeed, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century the sale or leasing of previously public-access land to Chinese farmers was a central factor in the formation of resistance movements in Inner Mongolia. Today in Mongolia's 'age of the market' (zah zeeliin üye) issues of land ownership are once again on the political agenda.
Inner Asia © 2001 Brill