You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The role of individual choice in the evolution of social complexity
Nina H. Fefferman and Kah Loon Ng
Annales Zoologici Fennici
Vol. 44, No. 1 (2007), pp. 58-69
Published by: Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23736744
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Constant re-evaluation of social affiliations and shifting social network structures can profoundly affect the adaptive fitness of individuals within a population, as well as yielding super-additive effects felt by the population as a whole. To evaluate the impact of different social affiliation choices, and the relative ability of individuals to correctly assess the success of other individuals, we have created a set of mathematical models based on network centrality measures. We choose the hypothetical measures of "popularity", "closeness" and "betweenness" to examine the resulting self-organizations of social groups. Our findings suggest that some different types of social behaviors can lead to the same levels of stability and organizational success, suggesting the possibility that complex organizations could have evolved from simpler ones without any change in the selective pressures acting on the population.
Annales Zoologici Fennici © 2007 Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board