Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Why do Larger Snakes Eat Larger Prey Items?

R. Shine
Functional Ecology
Vol. 5, No. 4 (1991), pp. 493-502
DOI: 10.2307/2389631
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2389631
Page Count: 10
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($18.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Why do Larger Snakes Eat Larger Prey Items?
Preview not available

Abstract

Field collections of snakes often reveal a correlation between the body size of a snake and the size of its prey. Such a correlation could result from biases in (1) encounter rates with prey items of different sizes (especially in aquatic or crevice-foraging species, in which smaller prey may be inaccessible to larger snakes), (2) prey choice, (3) ability to capture or handle prey, or (4) prey-swallowing ability. Field data showed that larger diamond pythons (Morelia spilota Lacapede, Boidae) took larger mean and maximum prey sizes, whereas prey mass did not correlate significantly with predator size in blacksnakes (Pseudechis porphyriacus Shaw, Elapidae). Minimum prey sizes increased little, if at all, in larger snakes of either species. Blacksnakes generally took much smaller prey items than did sympatric pythons. Laboratory trials with these two species showed that snakes with larger heads could eat larger prey, and eat prey of a given size more rapidly (and using fewer mandibular movements) than could snakes with smaller heads. Large blacksnakes were unable to enter narrow crevices to obtain prey items. Pythons could ingest much larger prey items than could blacksnakes. The rate of food intake for blacksnakes of all body sizes was highest with small prey items, whereas pythons (especially larger specimens) were more efficient with larger prey items. This fits well with field observations showing that blacksnakes of all body sizes eat small prey items, whereas pythons (especially larger specimens) consume larger prey items. The relationships between prey and predator size observed in the field are probably due to a combination of factors. Differential encounter rates, active selection of prey sizes and gape limitation may all be important influences on dietary composition in snakes.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
493
    493
  • Thumbnail: Page 
494
    494
  • Thumbnail: Page 
495
    495
  • Thumbnail: Page 
496
    496
  • Thumbnail: Page 
497
    497
  • Thumbnail: Page 
498
    498
  • Thumbnail: Page 
499
    499
  • Thumbnail: Page 
500
    500
  • Thumbnail: Page 
501
    501
  • Thumbnail: Page 
502
    502