Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Plant Allocation, Growth Rate and Successional Status

S. K. Gleeson and D. Tilman
Functional Ecology
Vol. 8, No. 4 (Aug., 1994), pp. 543-550
DOI: 10.2307/2390080
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2390080
Page Count: 8
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($18.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Plant Allocation, Growth Rate and Successional Status
Preview not available

Abstract

1. Theory predicts a negative correlation between root (and stem) allocation and growth rate in enriched environments (RGRmax), but evidence does not consistently support this. There is one possible supporting example from previous research in which root allocation in the field increases during old-field succession at the Cedar Creek Natural History Area, both community wide and for individual species samples, and RGRmax declines for some important species. 2. In this study, we confirm that late successional species have lower RGRmax for a larger sample of species (n = 28) as well as higher field root allocation. However, root allocation by seedlings does not increase for the late successional species for those same species in the greenhouse in enriched conditions; indeed it declines. 3. These results suggest that seedlings may have markedly different allocation than adults and that observed allocation patterns may be better viewed as adaptively plastic responses to resource gradients, rather than fixed species attributes that determine growth rates. Other, presumably less plastic characters (e.g. nitrogen- or water-use efficiency) may control growth rate, optimal allocation, and potentially competition and succession in this sample of plant types. 4. Leaf and stem allocation show no strong successional trend in the field or greenhouse, but do show a negative correlation with each other. Seed size is negatively correlated with growth rate, but shows no trend in relation to successional status.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
543
    543
  • Thumbnail: Page 
544
    544
  • Thumbnail: Page 
545
    545
  • Thumbnail: Page 
546
    546
  • Thumbnail: Page 
547
    547
  • Thumbnail: Page 
548
    548
  • Thumbnail: Page 
549
    549
  • Thumbnail: Page 
550
    550