Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Costs and Benefits of Activation of the Heat-Shock Response in Drosophila melanogaster

R. A. Krebs and V. Loeschcke
Functional Ecology
Vol. 8, No. 6 (Dec., 1994), pp. 730-737
DOI: 10.2307/2390232
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2390232
Page Count: 8
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($18.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Costs and Benefits of Activation of the Heat-Shock Response in Drosophila melanogaster
Preview not available

Abstract

1. The costs of conditioning adult Drosophila melanogaster with a mild thermal stress that activates the genes for heat-shock proteins were examined by comparing the number of offspring produced by females maintained continuously at 25⚬C with females exposed to a non-lethal stress, 36⚬C for 75 min, once, twice or three times. The comparison was done under two nutritional treatments, with or without yeast added to the medium. 2. Benefits of conditioning adult D. melanogaster to thermal stress were examined by comparing survival after a severe stress (39⚬C for 100 min) among flies that were not conditioned with those conditioned once, twice or three times by exposure to 36⚬C for 75 min. Additional comparisons were made varying either the duration of conditioning or the time elapsed between conditioning and exposure to the severe stress. 3. Fewer offspring were produced by females receiving the conditioning treatment than for those not receiving it and the decrease in fecundity was greater for females conditioned more often. Proportional differences in fecundity were larger for the no-yeast treatment than for females held with yeast. 4. Survival after the severe stress was much greater for flies that were conditioned than for those not conditioned and survival increased with increasing number of conditioning bouts. Survival also was greater for flies conditioned closer to the exposure to severe stress, with the exception that survival for flies conditioned only 2 or 4 h before exposure to severe stress was less than that for those conditioned 8 h before.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
730
    730
  • Thumbnail: Page 
731
    731
  • Thumbnail: Page 
732
    732
  • Thumbnail: Page 
733
    733
  • Thumbnail: Page 
734
    734
  • Thumbnail: Page 
735
    735
  • Thumbnail: Page 
736
    736
  • Thumbnail: Page 
737
    737