You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Participation with Supervisor and Subordinate Authoritarianism: A Path-Goal Theory Reconciliation
Randall S. Schuler
Administrative Science Quarterly
Vol. 21, No. 2 (Jun., 1976), pp. 320-325
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of the Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2392048
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Authoritarianism, Job satisfaction, Subordinate personnel, Questionnaires, Personality psychology, Employees, Statistical variance, Analysis of variance, Psychological reinforcement, Musical performance
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This research sought to reconcile previous studies in which participation and job satisfaction of subordinates were sometimes effectively moderated by their authoritarianism and sometimes not. The degree of task repetitiveness was hypothesized to determine when the authoritarianism of subordinates moderated between their participation with their supervisors and job satisfaction. It was hypothesized that: (1) participation would be satisfying to low-authoritarian subordinates regardless of the degree of task repetitiveness but would be satisfying to high-authoritarian subordinates only on tasks with low repetitiveness. (2) Highly repetitive tasks would be less conducive to ego involvement than low-repetitive tasks. These relationships were tested by questionnaires returned from 353 employees of a manufacturing organization who represented all levels of the hierarchy. The results supported the research, reconciling conflicting results obtained in previous studies.
Administrative Science Quarterly © 1976 Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University