You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Morphology and Development of Pistillate Inflorescences in Extant and Fossil Cercidiphyllaceae
Peter R. Crane and Ruth A. Stockey
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
Vol. 73, No. 2 (1986), pp. 382-393
Published by: Missouri Botanical Garden Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2399118
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Comparison of the shoots, pistillate inflorescences, and infructescences of Joffrea speirsii Crane & Stockey from the upper Paleocene of Canada, Nyssidium arcticum (Heer) Iljinskaya from the upper Paleocene of southern England, and Trochodendrocarpus arcticus (Heer) Kryshtofovich from the lower Paleocene of Amur, eastern U.S.S.R., reveals considerable diversity in phyllotaxy, shoot growth, inflorescence position, and the number and crowding of follicles in each infructescence. Despite this diversity, the pistillate inflorescences of all these fossil Cercidiphyllum-like plants are directly comparable in basic organization, to inflorescences of extant Cercidiphyllum. These similarities add to the evidence that the fossil and extant taxa are closely related and support the view that the condensed inflorescence of Cercidiphyllum evolved by reduction from an elongated form. In extant Cercidiphyllum each flower consists of a single carpel, but in fossil taxa flowers may contain either one or two carpels. The arrangement of carpels in bicarpellate flowers resembles that in extant Hamamelidaceae.
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden © 1986 Missouri Botanical Garden Press