You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Climatic Warming, Spring Budburst and Forest Damage on Trees
M. G. R. Cannell and R. I. Smith
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 23, No. 1 (Apr., 1986), pp. 177-191
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2403090
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Climate models, Frost damage, Cooling, Frost, Sine function, Climate change, Phenology, Chills, Chilling requirement, Dormancy
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) If future CO2-induced warming of 2 ⚬C increased the incidence of warm springs, of the type that have occurred in Britain during this century, then warming would induce earlier blossoming and budburst in many temperate trees, with an increase in the risk of subsequent damaging frosts. There would, for example, be an increase in the already high incidence of frost damage to apple blossom (Malus pumila Mill.) cv. Cox's Orange Pippin, in Kent and to new vegetative shoots of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. in the Scottish uplands. (2) If budburst occurred after a constant thermal time (e.g. 100 day ⚬C < 5 ⚬C after mid-January), then budburst would occur so much earlier in the spring that, on average, the temperature on the date of budburst would be lower than at present. Consequently, the risk of damaging frosts occurring after budburst would be much increased. (3) However, in many trees there is an increase in the thermal time to budburst with decreased chilling. This increase prevents very early budburst in warm springs, and lessens the risk of frost damage. (4) Theoretically, warming could delay or advance budburst, depending upon the extent to which a tree's chilling requirements are currently met. (5) Empirical thermal time-chilling models suggested that, on average, Cox's apple in Kent would blossom 18-24 days earlier than at present following 2 ⚬C warming, but that P. sitchensis in the Scottish uplands would burst its buds only 5 days earlier than at present.
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1986 British Ecological Society