You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Bias in Aerial Survey Estimates of Kangaroo Density
J. Short and P. Bayliss
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 22, No. 2 (Aug., 1985), pp. 415-422
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2403174
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) Aerial surveys of kangaroos provide population estimates which underestimate those derived from ground surveys. The degree of underestimation differs markedly between red and western grey kangaroos, between open plain and medium woodland, between sunny and overcast weather conditions and between observers. Estimates derived from aerial survey in sunny weather ranged from 74% of ground counts for red kangaroos on open plains to <10% for grey kangaroos in medium woodland. (2) Differences in 'sightability' of kangaroos between observers and for the same observer in different weather conditions suggest the need for standardization of the conditions under which surveys are flown. (3) Estimates of visibility bias currently used to convert observed aerial counts of kangaroos to absolute estimates of population size appear to overestimate the population size of red kangaroos and considerably underestimate that of western grey kangaroos. (4) Further research is required to establish the relationship between vegetation cover and visibility bias for all harvested kangaroo species over a representative range of vegetation types.
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1985 British Ecological Society