## Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

## If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

# The Influence of Rainfall and Grazing on the Demography of Some African Savanna Grasses: A Matrix Modelling Approach

T. G. O'Connor
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 30, No. 1 (1993), pp. 119-132
DOI: 10.2307/2404276
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404276
Page Count: 14

#### Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
Preview not available

## Abstract

1. Size-structured matrix models were constructed for the perennial grasses of two African savannas (Aristida bipartita, Bothriochloa insculpta, Digitaria eriantha, Heteropogon contortus, Setaria incrassata and Themeda triandra) separately for each of four 1-year transitions under light or heavy grazing. 2. The asymptotic population growth rate varied between years in relation to rainfall trends, but there were few marked differences between grazing treatments. Aristida had the highest asymptotic growth rate (λ1 = 1.624) over a single transition period, while the heavily grazed population of Heteropogon had the lowest (λ1 = 0.552). Most species declined in the final dry year. The stable stage distribution was generally a reversed `J'. The geometric mean of the four transition periods indicated that most populations were relatively stable ($\lambda_1 \backsimeq$ 1), although the populations of Aristida (mean λ1 = 1.301 and 1.135) and Digitaria (mean λ1 = 1.154 and 1.176) increased while that of Setaria (mean λ1 = 0.911 and 0.937) and Heteropogon (heavily grazed, λ1 = 0.914) decreased. 3. The survival of the smallest size-class was important for declining populations or populations whose largest size-classes were collapsing, while the fraction either remaining in a size-class or increasing was important for stable or growing populations. Reproductive output varied widely, but had a minor effect on population growth. 4. The population growth rates of most species were positively correlated, indicating that an extrinsic force, presumably rainfall, had the greatest effect on population growth.

• 119
• 120
• 121
• 122
• 123
• 124
• 125
• 126
• 127
• 128
• 129
• 130
• 131
• 132