You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Influence of Rainfall and Grazing on the Demography of Some African Savanna Grasses: A Matrix Modelling Approach
T. G. O'Connor
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 30, No. 1 (1993), pp. 119-132
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404276
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Population growth rate, Grasses, Matrices, Savannas, Species, Population growth, Ecological modeling, Rain, Applied ecology, Plant ecology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. Size-structured matrix models were constructed for the perennial grasses of two African savannas (Aristida bipartita, Bothriochloa insculpta, Digitaria eriantha, Heteropogon contortus, Setaria incrassata and Themeda triandra) separately for each of four 1-year transitions under light or heavy grazing. 2. The asymptotic population growth rate varied between years in relation to rainfall trends, but there were few marked differences between grazing treatments. Aristida had the highest asymptotic growth rate (λ1 = 1.624) over a single transition period, while the heavily grazed population of Heteropogon had the lowest (λ1 = 0.552). Most species declined in the final dry year. The stable stage distribution was generally a reversed `J'. The geometric mean of the four transition periods indicated that most populations were relatively stable ($\lambda_1 \backsimeq$ 1), although the populations of Aristida (mean λ1 = 1.301 and 1.135) and Digitaria (mean λ1 = 1.154 and 1.176) increased while that of Setaria (mean λ1 = 0.911 and 0.937) and Heteropogon (heavily grazed, λ1 = 0.914) decreased. 3. The survival of the smallest size-class was important for declining populations or populations whose largest size-classes were collapsing, while the fraction either remaining in a size-class or increasing was important for stable or growing populations. Reproductive output varied widely, but had a minor effect on population growth. 4. The population growth rates of most species were positively correlated, indicating that an extrinsic force, presumably rainfall, had the greatest effect on population growth.
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1993 British Ecological Society