You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Interpreting Bird Atlas Data Using Logistic Models: An Example From Lesotho, Southern Africa
P. E. Osborne and B. J. Tigar
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 29, No. 1 (1992), pp. 55-62
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404347
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Birds, Atlases, Modeling, Logistics, Maps, Wildlife habitats, Altitude, Species, Woodpeckers, Logistic regression
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. Presence-absence maps of the occurrence of species may be difficult to interpret because of uneven coverage in field surveys. 2. Using data collected in the mountain Kingdom of Lesotho, southern Africa, where even coverage was virtually impossible to achieve, a method is presented to improve bird atlas maps by plotting predicted probabilities of occurrence calculated from logistic models. 3. A set of habitat variables derived from maps was reduced to principal components and then used in logistic models to predict the occurrence of bird species across the country. The models generate a probability of occurrence for all survey squares irrespective of coverage. Maps for the Cape vulture Gyps coprotheres (Forster), ground woodpecker Geocolaptes olivaceus (Gmelin) and pied crow Corvus albus Muller are presented as examples. 4. The models were assessed by jack-knife analysis and correctly predicted presence and absence in the field data. 5. Relationships between the predicted probabilities, recording frequency (reporting rate) and density are discussed.
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1992 British Ecological Society