You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Determinants of Stemwood Production in Pinus contorta var. Latifolia Forests: The Influence of Site Quality and Stand Structure
James N. Long and Frederick W. Smith
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 27, No. 3 (Dec., 1990), pp. 847-856
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404381
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Leaf area, Coniferous forests, Forest ecology, Stand density, Leaf area index, Tree growth, Production efficiency, Productivity, Forest stands, Leaves
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) Leaf area index of mature stands of lodgepole pine was independent of stand density. Thus, stand density did not affect total leaf area, but strongly influenced leaf area per tree. (2) Leaf area index and site index were significantly but weakly related in the lodgepole pine stands in this study. (3) While the growth of stem volume was significantly (r2 = 0.45) related to leaf area index, residual variation was associated with differences in stand structure. (4) Mean tree growth increased with mean leaf area, but at a decreasing rate; this indicates the relatively low efficiency with which leaf area on large trees produces stemwood volume. (5) Reduced leaf area efficiency of large trees in low density stands was related to increased respiration requirements resulting from greater relative amounts of non-photosynthetic to photosynthetic tissue. This explanation for differences in leaf area efficiency is supported by the observation that the ratio of foliage to total crown biomass was inversely proportional to mean crown size.
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1990 British Ecological Society