Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Commercial Picking of Banksia hookeriana in the Wild Reduces Subsequent Shoot, Flower and Seed Production

E. T. F. Witkowski, Byron B. Lamont and F. J. Obbens
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 31, No. 3 (Aug., 1994), pp. 508-520
DOI: 10.2307/2404446
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404446
Page Count: 13
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($18.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Commercial Picking of Banksia hookeriana in the Wild Reduces Subsequent Shoot, Flower and Seed Production
Preview not available

Abstract

1. The impact of bloom picking on subsequent flower and cone production, seed bank dynamics and plant architecture was studied in three picked and three unpicked 13-year-old populations of Banksia hookeriana, a canopy seed-storing, fire-sensitive shrub, growing on infertile sands in dry-mediterranean scrub-heath near Eneabba, Western Australia. 2. Since reaching reproductive maturity at 4 years, bloom picking over the subsequent 9 years reduced plant canopy area and volume by 37% and 44% respectively, with a 56% reduction in the number of 1-year-old stems, compared with the unpicked plants. 3. A total of 13255 blooms ha-1 was picked over the 9 years, accounting for 29% of total production. Cockatoos removed a further 2477 blooms ha-1 (5% of the total), but removed over 3 times as many blooms in the unpicked plants (7562 ha-1, 7% of the total). 4. Resprouting was much more likely from cockatoo-damaged stems than from picked stems. 5. Picked plants produced 35% fewer blooms than unpicked plants, but percentage cone fertility and the number of follicles per fertile cone did not differ significantly. 6. Seed production and storage per individual plant were 50% and 57% lower respectively in the picked plants. 7. There was a slight increase in total insect-eaten seeds (4%), and a slight decrease in viable seeds (9%), in picked plants; but there were no significant differences in the fractions of seeds released, aborted or non-viable. 8. The reduced seed store following picking could adversely affect post-fire regeneration, particularly if fires were at short intervals followed by an unusually severe summer drought. 9. The study shows the usefulness of demographic studies in guiding management to resolve the conflict between commercial exploitation and the conservation of rare plant species.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
508
    508
  • Thumbnail: Page 
509
    509
  • Thumbnail: Page 
510
    510
  • Thumbnail: Page 
511
    511
  • Thumbnail: Page 
512
    512
  • Thumbnail: Page 
513
    513
  • Thumbnail: Page 
514
    514
  • Thumbnail: Page 
515
    515
  • Thumbnail: Page 
516
    516
  • Thumbnail: Page 
517
    517
  • Thumbnail: Page 
518
    518
  • Thumbnail: Page 
519
    519
  • Thumbnail: Page 
520
    520