You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Survival, Growth and Water Relations of Banksia Seedlings on a Sand Mine Rehabilitation Site and Adjacent Scrub-Heath Sites
N. J. Enright and Byron B. Lamont
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 29, No. 3 (1992), pp. 663-671
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404474
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. Survival, growth, and water relations of first-year seedlings of the shrub species Banksia attenuata, B. leptophylla, and B. hookeriana, were compared in scrub-heath and sand-mine rehabilitation sites. 2. Survival and growth of the broad-leaved B. hookeriana and B. attenuata were lower in the rehabilitation site than in two contrasting natural areas, but the needle-leaved species, B. leptophylla, survived and grew equally well in all three sites. 3. Root system development was poorer in the rehabilitation site: tap-roots stopped at the topsoil/subsoil boundary at 0.1 m in the rehabilitation site, while they reached 2 m at the natural sites. 4. Seedlings in the rehabilitation site had much lower pre-dawn xylem pressure potentials (XPP) and stomatal conductance. 5. Soil water potentials (ψ) in the top 0.5 m of the soil profile were generally lowest at the natural sites, and almost always lower than XPP. At these sites, seedlings must have been obtaining water over summer - autumn from deeper in the soil via their well-developed tap-roots. Topsoil ψ in the rehabilitation site was more similar to XPP than the much higher values in the subsoils, which rarely contained roots. 6. Impedance of the rehabilitation soils was significantly greater than that for soils at the two natural sites. It appeared to explain the poor root development and dependence of seedlings on soil water stored near the surface; the consequent lower xylem potentials, stomatal conductances and growth rates; and the ultimately higher mortality levels.
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1992 British Ecological Society