You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Fragility of Ecosystems: A Review
Christer Nilsson and Gunnell Grelsson
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 32, No. 4 (Nov., 1995), pp. 677-692
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404808
Page Count: 16
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. The identification of species, communities, or ecosystems that are likely to be strongly damaged by human activities (i.e. that are fragile) forms an essential part of nature conservation management. We review the meaning of ecosystem fragility, which we define as the inverse of ecosystem stability. 2. Many definitions of fragility and stability have been proposed but all conclude that the concepts are too complex to be meaningfully defined, and therefore divide them into smaller entities. This variety of terms has not proved useful in nature conservation management. 3. Fragility may be regarded as an inherent property of an ecosystem, i.e. an ecosystem has a certain fragility whether or not it is ever exposed to any disturbances. This fragility is impossible to quantify, leaving it as a mere metaphysical term. The only observable fragility is that displayed as a result of disturbances, natural as well as human-caused, operating in the ecosystem. Therefore, relating ecosystems to the disturbances that work there can provide useful assessments, an approach closely related to environmental impact assessment. 4. Basically, fragility and stability of an ecosystem relate to degree of change in species abundance and composition, following disturbance. High rates of species turnover or population fluctuations characterize fragile ecosystems, and vice versa. The diversity of ecological processes related to these changes makes ecosystem fragility a central evaluation criterion in conservation management. Fragility is also closely related to many frequently used criteria in evaluation and assessment for conservation. 5. We consider how the concept of ecosystem fragility can be applied in nature conservation, how to systematize its assessment, and how to locate especially fragile areas.
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1995 British Ecological Society