You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Decomposition of Genetically Engineered Tobacco Under Field Conditions: Persistence of the Proteinase Inhibitor I Product and Effects on Soil Microbial Respiration and Protozoa, Nematode and Microarthropod Populations
K. K. Donegan, R. J. Seidler, V. J. Fieland, D. L. Schaller, C. J. Palm, L. M. Ganio, D. M. Cardwell and Y. Steinberger
Journal of Applied Ecology
Vol. 34, No. 3 (Jun., 1997), pp. 767-777
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2404921
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Soil ecology, Transgenic plants, Soil samples, Plant litter, Soil nematodes, Protease inhibitors, Roundworms, Soil microorganisms, Transgenic insects, Applied ecology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. To evaluate the potential effects of genetically engineered (transgenic) plants on soil ecosystems, litterbags containing leaves of non-engineered (parental) and transgenic tobacco plants were buried in field plots. The transgenic tobacco plants were genetically engineered to constitutively produce proteinase inhibitor I, a protein with insecticidal activity. 2. The litterbag contents and surrounding soil, as well as soil from control plots without litterbags, were sampled over a 5-month period at 2- to 4-week intervals and assayed for proteinase inhibitor concentration, litter decomposition rates, carbon and nitrogen content, microbial respiration rates and population levels of nematodes, protozoa and microarthropods. 3. The proteinase inhibitor concentration in the transgenic plant litter after 57 days was 0.05% of the sample day 0-value and was not detectable on subsequent sample days. Although the carbon content of the transgenic plant litter was comparable to that of the parental plant litter on sample day 0, it became significantly lower over the course of the experiment. 4. Nematode populations in the soil surrounding the transgenic plant litterbags were greater than those in the soil surrounding parental plant litterbags and had a different trophic group composition, including a significantly higher ratio of fungal feeding nematodes to bacterial feeding nematodes on sample day 57. In contrast, Collembola populations in the soil surrounding the transgenic plant litterbags were significantly lower than in the soil surrounding parental plant litterbags. 5. Our results demonstrated that under field conditions proteinase inhibitor remained immunologically active in buried transgenic plant litter for at least 57 days and that decomposing parental and transgenic plant litter differed in quality (carbon content) and in the response of exposed soil organisms (Collembola and nematodes).
Journal of Applied Ecology © 1997 British Ecological Society