You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comments on the Definition of Genera
Robert F. Inger
Vol. 12, No. 3 (Sep., 1958), pp. 370-384
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2405859
Page Count: 15
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Methods of delimiting genera fall into two broad categories: typological and non-typological. Typological methods fail to consider the biological significance of characters with the results that phylogeny becomes an afterthought of taxonomy and that a classification so arrived at often does not take into account the concepts of related biological fields. Non-typological methods, on the other hand, analyze characters in biological terms, that is, in terms of genetics, developmental mechanics, behavior, ecology, etc. Such an analysis is more likely to lead to an understanding of phylogeny, which must be the basis of a biological classification, than is a typological method. Because the evolution of a group of organisms is essentially a history of successive adaptations, a study of adaptation is probably the best means of ascertaining the phylogeny and, in turn, of establishing a reasonably stable classification. An attempt to delimit genera on the basis of the principal adaptive trends within a family is recommended with the expectation that the taxa so defined will be products of phylogeny and will reveal the biologically most significant differences between groups. A generic classification based on complex adaptive features has a number of advantages. Firstly, each genus will represent the same kind of entity: a distinct mode of life and a distinct evolutionary shift. Secondly, genera so defined lead to predictions of habits and ecology that test taxonomic conclusions. Thirdly, the value of the genus as a synthetic category indicating species interrelationship is maximized.
Evolution © 1958 Society for the Study of Evolution