Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Monophyly or Diphyly in the Origin of Whales

Leigh Van Valen
Evolution
Vol. 22, No. 1 (Mar., 1968), pp. 37-41
DOI: 10.2307/2406647
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2406647
Page Count: 5
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($4.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Monophyly or Diphyly in the Origin of Whales
Preview not available

Abstract

The recent toothed and whalebone wales differ in many characters, indicating that some adaptations to aquatic life were evolved independently in the two suborders. A review of the known osteological characters and comparisons with archaeocetes show that, for every character, the possibly congeneric Middle Eocene forms Protocetus and Pappocetus could be directly ancestral to both recent suborders. The rapid early evolution of whales was incomplete by the middle Eocene. The toothed genus Aetiocetus is placed in the Mysticeti.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
37
    37
  • Thumbnail: Page 
38
    38
  • Thumbnail: Page 
39
    39
  • Thumbnail: Page 
40
    40
  • Thumbnail: Page 
41
    41